#web application Startups & Tools

Security auditing remains a bottleneck in application development. Traditional penetration testing services charge substantial fees and require weeks of scheduling, creating misalignment between security needs and deployment velocity. AISafe Labs attacks this problem directly with an on-demand platform that automates security assessments using AI agents, delivering results within hours at a fraction of conventional pricing. Founded by security researchers, the platform operates three testing modes. Source code audits use static analysis to examine application codebases for vulnerabilities. White-box penetration tests combine code review with live testing against running applications. Black-box assessments test applications without source code access. This layered approach addresses different threat models and discovery scenarios. The company positions itself on a specific technical insight: traditional automated security tooling misses sophisticated logic vulnerabilities, particularly as AI-generated code becomes more prevalent in production systems. Rather than rely on pattern matching for known vulnerabilities, AISafe's agents analyze code behavior and application logic to uncover authorization bypasses, session handling flaws, and similar control-plane weaknesses that escape conventional scanners. The platform dashboard demonstrates this through concrete findings—unauthorized data modification in API sessions, database policy misconfiguration enabling access control bypass, missing rate limiting on sensitive endpoints, and credentials embedded in URLs. The product launched with source code auditing and has expanded into penetration testing capabilities. Users manage multiple ongoing assessments through a unified dashboard, track findings by severity, and export reports as PDFs for sharing or compliance. Findings link to specific code locations, enabling developers to immediately understand and remediate issues. AISafe's business model centers on accessibility and speed. The messaging emphasizes availability at any hour without the gatekeeping of boutique security firms. Specific pricing is not disclosed, but the positioning directly challenges the premium rates charged by traditional security consultancies. The founding team's background in security research suggests domain credibility, though the exact nature of their expertise is not detailed in available materials. The core appeal is straightforward: organizations that want security assessments faster and cheaper than traditional services, without replacing them entirely with commodity automated scanners, represent the likely customer base.